In Ancient Greek, as well as in other languages, whenever agreement is triggered by two or more coordinated phrases, two different constructions are allowed: either the agreement can be controlled by the coordinated phrase as a whole, or it can be triggered by just one of the coordinated words. In spite of the amount of information that can be read on this topic in grammars of Ancient Greek, much is still to be known even at a general descriptive level. More importantly, the data still lack a convincing explanation. In this paper, we focus on a special domain of agreement (subject and verb agreement) and on one morphological feature that is expected to covary (number). We discuss the agreement in number for conjoined phrases, by revising some of the modern hypotheses with the support of the empirical evidence that can be collected from the available syntactically annotated corpora of Ancient Greek (treebanks). Results are interpreted according to syntactic features, cognitive factors and semantic properties of the coordinated phrases.

中文翻译：

---

古希腊语中与协调主语的主谓一致

在古希腊语和其他语言中，当一致由两个或多个并列短语触发时，允许有两种不同的结构：一致可由整个并列短语控制，或者仅由一个并列短语触发。的协调词。尽管可以在古希腊语语法中阅读有关该主题的大量信息，但即使在一般描述级别，仍有许多内容需要了解。更重要的是，数据仍然缺乏令人信服的解释。在本文中，我们专注于一个特殊的一致性领域（主语和动词一致性）和一个预期共变的形态特征（数字）。我们讨论连词的数量一致，通过在可以从古希腊语（树库）的可用句法注释语料库中收集的经验证据的支持下修改一些现代假设。结果根据协调短语的句法特征、认知因素和语义特性进行解释。