当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Journal of Contemporary European Research
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Views of Europe: National Civil Society Organisations for Binational Family Rights on the Road to Brussels
Journal of Contemporary European Research Pub Date : 2018-06-22 , DOI: 10.30950/jcer.v14i2.873 Laura Odasso
Journal of Contemporary European Research Pub Date : 2018-06-22 , DOI: 10.30950/jcer.v14i2.873 Laura Odasso
Employing a sociological actor-centred approach, this article explores the interrelations between individual and organisational dynamics by investigating how national civil society organisations’ (CSOs) leaders, board and rank-and-file members’ views of Europe(s) contribute to the CSOs’ process of reaching consensus about going European. Bottom-up Europeanization and social movement studies are employed to analyse the case of a French CSO joining a European network of national CSOs in order to defend the rights of binational couples. These couples, composed of a European and an extra-European citizen, have been particularly affected since mid-1990 by restrictive policies that the EU has attempted to harmonise, but that remain nationally rooted. Thanks to an in-depth ethnography and drawing on the ‘usages of Europe’ and the ‘Europeanness’ literature, three views of Europe, arguments to use or not to use Europe in CSOs, have been identified. These views, defined as instrumental, pro-European and Euro-sceptical, depend on individuals’ generation and education, as well as on their motives for engagement and their roles in the CSO. The national CSO leadership and board have to negotiate with this plurality of views before defining activities. In so doing, they have to consider economic and human resource shortages. Thus, beyond divergent positions towards Europe, consensus is reached on the possibility of using Europe as an instrument for national policy changes and CSO visibility. Such dynamics, employed to harmonise disparate views of Europe, are reproduced once national CSOs are acting in the European network and tend to create a weak experience of Europeanization, mainly based on the transnationalisation of the CSO's activities.
中文翻译:
欧洲的观点:在通往布鲁塞尔的道路上争取两国家庭权利的国家民间社会组织
本文采用以社会学行动者为中心的方法,通过调查国家公民社会组织 (CSO) 领导人、董事会和普通成员对欧洲的看法如何对公民社会组织做出贡献,探讨了个人动态和组织动态之间的相互关系' 就走向欧洲达成共识的过程。自下而上的欧洲化和社会运动研究被用来分析法国公民社会组织加入欧洲国家公民社会组织网络以捍卫两国夫妇的权利的案例。自 1990 年中期以来,这些由欧洲公民和非欧洲公民组成的夫妇尤其受到欧盟试图协调但仍根植于全国的限制性政策的影响。由于深入的民族志和借鉴“欧洲的用法”和“欧洲性”文献,已经确定了欧洲的三种观点,即在公民社会组织中使用或不使用欧洲的论据。这些观点被定义为工具性的、亲欧洲的和怀疑欧洲的,取决于个人的世代和教育,以及他们参与的动机和他们在公民社会组织中的角色。在定义活动之前,国家公民社会组织领导层和董事会必须就这种多元化的观点进行协商。在这样做时,他们必须考虑经济和人力资源短缺。因此,除了对欧洲的不同立场之外,就利用欧洲作为国家政策变化和公民社会组织可见性工具的可能性达成了共识。这种动态,用来协调欧洲的不同观点,
更新日期:2018-06-22
中文翻译:
欧洲的观点:在通往布鲁塞尔的道路上争取两国家庭权利的国家民间社会组织
本文采用以社会学行动者为中心的方法,通过调查国家公民社会组织 (CSO) 领导人、董事会和普通成员对欧洲的看法如何对公民社会组织做出贡献,探讨了个人动态和组织动态之间的相互关系' 就走向欧洲达成共识的过程。自下而上的欧洲化和社会运动研究被用来分析法国公民社会组织加入欧洲国家公民社会组织网络以捍卫两国夫妇的权利的案例。自 1990 年中期以来,这些由欧洲公民和非欧洲公民组成的夫妇尤其受到欧盟试图协调但仍根植于全国的限制性政策的影响。由于深入的民族志和借鉴“欧洲的用法”和“欧洲性”文献,已经确定了欧洲的三种观点,即在公民社会组织中使用或不使用欧洲的论据。这些观点被定义为工具性的、亲欧洲的和怀疑欧洲的,取决于个人的世代和教育,以及他们参与的动机和他们在公民社会组织中的角色。在定义活动之前,国家公民社会组织领导层和董事会必须就这种多元化的观点进行协商。在这样做时,他们必须考虑经济和人力资源短缺。因此,除了对欧洲的不同立场之外,就利用欧洲作为国家政策变化和公民社会组织可见性工具的可能性达成了共识。这种动态,用来协调欧洲的不同观点,