New technologies combined with the internet have fundamentally altered our ability to have control over the diffusion of information and its impact on human behaviour. This paper explains this change as well as the transformation of the concept of privacy itself. The main part of the paper analyses the case law relating to local activities such as CCTV cameras in private buildings which serve to protect the property of the camera system operators. The author defends the regulation of privacy against the intrusions of providers of telecommunications and data services and corporations such as Google and Facebook. This should be exercised by the law of the EU because autonomous domestic regulation would endanger the free movement of services across the EU. Moreover, it would be difficult for separate national regulation to be successful in fighting global corporations like Google. On the other hand, there is not much sense in the European regulation of activities that are local by their very nature, such as the use of CCTV cameras in private buildings to protect the camera system operators’ property.

中文翻译：

---

Ryneš案和21世纪侵犯隐私的责任

与互联网结合的新技术从根本上改变了我们控制信息传播及其对人类行为影响的能力。本文解释了这种变化以及隐私概念本身的转变。本文的主要部分分析了与当地活动有关的判例法，例如私人建筑中的闭路电视摄像机，其目的是保护摄像机系统运营商的财产。作者捍卫隐私权法规，以防止电信和数据服务提供商以及Google和Facebook等公司入侵。这应该由欧盟法律来执行，因为自主的国内法规会危害整个欧盟范围内服务的自由流动。此外，单独的国家法规很难成功地建立起像Google这样的跨国公司。另一方面，欧洲就其本质上的本地活动的监管并没有多大意义，例如在私人建筑物中使用CCTV摄像机来保护摄像机系统运营商的财产。