By analysing intelligence-gathering reform legislation this article discusses access to justice for communications interception by the intelligence and security services. In the aftermath of the Snowden revelations, sophisticated oversight systems for bulk communications surveillance are being established across the globe. In the Netherlands prior judicial consent and a binding complaint procedure have been established. However, although checks and balances for targeted communications interference have been created, accountability mechanisms are less equipped to effectively remedy indiscriminate interference. Therefore, within the context of mass communications surveillance programs, access to justice for complainants remains a contentious issue.

中文翻译：

---

进行通信监视和拦截的司法途径：审查情报收集改革立法

通过分析情报收集改革法规，本文讨论了情报和安全部门拦截通信的司法救助。在斯诺登（Snowden）的启示之后，全球范围内都建立了用于批量通信监视的复杂监督系统。在荷兰，已经建立了事先司法同意和具有约束力的申诉程序。但是，尽管已经建立了针对目标通信干扰的制衡机制，但问责机制却不足以有效纠正不加区别的干扰。因此，在大众传播监视方案的范围内，申诉人诉诸司法仍然是一个有争议的问题。