当前位置: X-MOL 学术Utrecht Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Shaping the Social Market Economy After the Lisbon Treaty: How ‘Social’ is Public Economic Law?
Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2019-09-04 , DOI: 10.18352/ulr.509
Anna Gerbrandy , Willem Janssen , Lyndsey Thomsin

Since the introduction of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009, public authorities in the European Union (EU) operate within a social market economy. This socioeconomic model inherently contains an initial promise that social objectives – in addition to economic objectives – have an important role to play in creating this context. Whilst aiming to contribute to social objectives and, thus, shape their part of this economy, public authorities are frequently faced with the possibilities and the often emphasised limitations of public economic law, which most prominently includes EU public procurement law, EU state aid law and EU competition law. This contribution considers the legal tensions that can arise when these authorities aim to pursue social objectives within the remit of these fields of law. Based on the areas of sustainability and employment, it argues that public economic law contains various suitable instruments for the pursuit of these objectives, but also that differences still exist between how a balance is struck between the ‘economic’ and the ‘social’, thereby creating obstacles for public authorities and their social agenda.

中文翻译:

《里斯本条约》之后塑造社会市场经济:公共经济法如何“社会化”?

自2009年引入《里斯本条约》以来,欧盟(EU)的公共当局在社会市场经济中运作。这种社会经济模型固有地包含一个最初的承诺,即社会目标(除了经济目标之外)在创造这种环境中也可以发挥重要作用。在致力于为社会目标做出贡献并从而塑造其在经济中的地位的同时,公共当局经常面临着公共经济法的可能性和经常强调的局限性,其中最主要的包括欧盟公共采购法,欧盟国家援助法和欧盟竞争法。这些意见考虑了当这些主管部门试图在这些法律领域内追求社会目标时可能引起的法律紧张局势。根据可持续发展和就业领域,
更新日期:2019-09-04
down
wechat
bug