France has a culture of problem-solving justice that is particularly evident in the field of criminal justice. The question may arise however, whether this is also the case in the field of administrative justice, which has a specific purpose directing it to verify whether the decisions of public administrations are legal and to quash them when they are not. The article investigates how the intervention of the French legislator and administrative case law have gradually developed legal tools and practices aimed at solving problems. Many of these tools and practices concern the implementation of alternatives to judgments that allow the parties to find an amicable solution, often with the help of the administrative judges. Yet there are also many tools that allow the judges to solve the problems through their court decisions. The article presents an analysis of the characteristics of French administrative justice as a problem-solving justice and questions the limits of this approach and its future evolution.

中文翻译：

---

法国行政司法是解决问题的司法吗？

法国拥有解决问题的司法文化，这在刑事司法领域尤为明显。但是，可能会出现一个问题，在行政司法领域是否也是这种情况，行政司法的具体目的是指导其核实公共行政机关的决定是否合法，并在不合法时予以废除。本文调查了法国立法者和行政判例法的干预如何逐步开发出旨在解决问题的法律工具和实践。这些工具和实践中有许多都与替代判决的实施有关，这些替代判决通常允许在行政法官的协助下，使当事方找到友好的解决方案。但是，还有许多工具可以使法官通过法院的判决解决问题。