Investigative Journalism is the act of the journalists which goes beyond simple reporting of events in the press. It involves newsgathering by taking an initiative to get the required information. The information in this case is not easily available. The extra effort taken for this type of newsgathering is termed investigative journalism. This method has gained great momentum in India. The need for this study is motivated by the fact that though India is a party to United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the subsequent ICCPR 1966, it has failed to make Privacy a part of the Indian Constitution while Press is accepted as a fundamental right. Today the press in India like in other nations is under the control of multinationals, which use this as a weapon to dictate the government and the masses. It is in this scenario that this study becomes relevant, where due to lack of legislative intent the media has become an unbridled horse. This makes an individual vulnerable to media attacks and trials. This study will focus on Indian position and make a comparative analysis of the position in other nations which have a strong impact on Indian decision making and make suggestions to bring in importance for Privacy in India. The method adopted to collect data for this study is through literature survey and review.

中文翻译：

---

新闻业：新趋势及其对隐私权的影响。比较分析，特别参考印度

新闻调查是新闻记者的行为，不仅限于新闻界对事件的简单报道。它涉及通过主动获取所需信息来进行新闻收集。这种情况下的信息不容易获得。这类新闻收集所付出的额外努力被称为调查新闻。这种方法在印度获得了很大的发展。进行这项研究的动机是，尽管印度是《联合国人权宣言》和随后的1966年《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》的缔约国，但它并没有使隐私成为印度宪法的一部分，而新闻界被视为一项基本权利。如今，印度的新闻界像其他国家一样，受到跨国公司的控制，跨国公司以此为武器来统治政府和群众。正是在这种情况下，这项研究才有意义，由于缺乏立法意图，媒体已成为一匹马。这使个人容易受到媒体攻击和审判。这项研究将侧重于印度的立场，并对其他国家的立场进行比较分析，这些国家对印度的决策有重大影响，并提出了提高印度隐私权重要性的建议。本研究采用的数据收集方法是通过文献调查和审查。这项研究将侧重于印度的立场，并对其他国家的立场进行比较分析，这些国家对印度的决策有重大影响，并提出了提高印度隐私权重要性的建议。本研究采用的数据收集方法是通过文献调查和审查。这项研究将侧重于印度的立场，并对其他国家的立场进行比较分析，这些国家对印度的决策有重大影响，并提出了提高印度隐私权重要性的建议。本研究采用的数据收集方法是通过文献调查和审查。