In a context of progressive deterritorialization, the analysis of the judicial dialogue has certain profits when reformulating some aspects of a particular way of understanding the law, characterized by the principle of territoriality and by a theory of the sources of law in which the judge has a clearly secondary position in relation to the legislature and in which the sources are relevant since they are understood as explicit expression of a will. This paper describes the operability of the dialogue between the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights which, horizontally and voluntarily, can help create a context of community in relation to the contents of human rights, based on the recognition of the value of judicial arguments and the judge's self-understanding as members of a hermeneutical community.

中文翻译：

---

美欧之间的人权与司法对话：走向新的法律模式？

在渐进式地域化的背景下，重新制定以某种方式理解法律的某些方式的某些方面时，对司法对话的分析具有一定的益处，其特点是地域性原则和法官具有法律效力的法律渊源理论。相对于立法机关而言，它显然是次要的，并且与来源相关，因为它们被理解为意志的明确表达。本文描述了美洲人权法院与欧洲人权法院之间对话的可操作性，该对话可横向，自愿地基于对人权内容的帮助，有助于建立与人权内容相关的社区环境。司法辩论的价值和法官作为诠释学团体成员的自我理解。