This article explores the development and negotiation of colonial surveillance practices and technologies at religious sites. In this article I posit that colonial surveillance at religious sites is different—that, unlike in other colonial spaces, the particularities of holy sites as arenas of contestation can enlarge the scope of worshippers’ negotiation of state surveillance technologies and practices, while enabling new modes of claim-making of rights and resources articulated through surveillance. I draw on the case study of Haram-al-Sharif/Temple Mount, a site in occupied East Jerusalem holy to both Muslim and Jewish worshippers, to explore how different surveillance policies and practices are articulated and contested at religious sites in a (settler) colonial setting. I examine three facets of surveillance employed at this holy site: Israeli digital surveillance, Palestinian grassroots sousveillance, and internationally prescribed adjudicating surveillance. Through an examination of these different facets, this article investigates how particular religious, national, and citizenship claims emerge when surveillance is leveraged in order to balance, mitigate, or resolve conflicts.

中文翻译：

---

从上到下：在耶路撒冷圣殿山/圣城哈里夫进行监视，宗教和认领

本文探讨了宗教场所的殖民监视实践和技术的发展与谈判。在本文中，我认为宗教场所的殖民监视是不同的，与其他殖民地空间不同，圣地作为竞争场所的特殊性可以扩大信徒对国家监视技术和做法的谈判范围，同时可以采用新的模式通过监视阐明的权利和资源的索偿要求。我以哈拉姆沙里夫/圣殿山为例，这是一个在被占领的东耶路撒冷圣地，对穆斯林和犹太信徒来说都是圣地，以探讨如何在（定居者）的宗教场所阐明和反对不同的监视政策和做法。殖民地环境。我研究了在此圣地进行监视的三个方面：以色列的数字监视，巴勒斯坦基层监视以及国际上规定的裁决监视。通过对这些不同方面的研究，本文研究了在利用监视来平衡，减轻或解决冲突时，如何出现特定的宗教，民族和公民权利主张。