Purpose: This study analyzed the present status of data sharing polices and attitudes towards such policies through a web-based survey of editors of scholarly journals published in Korea. Methods: From December 26, 2018 to January 3, 2019, a survey was distributed to 1,055 persons listed in the member directories of both the Korean Council of Science Editors and the Korean Federation of Science & Technology Societies. The survey contained four items on subjects’ information, three items that gathered information about the journals, and two further items on reasons for adopting or not adopting a data sharing policy and further opinions about such policies. Results: Of the 100 respondents (from 100 journals), 13 stated that their journals had already adopted a data sharing policy. The strength of the policy was recommendation-only in 10 of those 13 journals. The most frequent reason for adopting a data sharing policy was to follow international trends. The repository sites were the Harvard Dataverse for two journals and Mendeley Data for one. The most common reasons for not adopting a data sharing policy were a lack of knowledge on data sharing, the possibility that submitters would not want to share their data, and the questionable effect of data sharing on scientific development. Conclusion: Data sharing policies were uncommon among Korean scholarly journals. The advantages and disadvantages of adopting such policies should be discussed more actively among editors and researchers. Furthermore, data sharing infrastructure and training courses are required for data sharing policies to be established in scholarly journals in Korea.

中文翻译：

---

韩国学术期刊编辑当前和计划采用的数据共享政策

目的：本研究通过对韩国出版的学术期刊编辑的网络调查，分析了数据共享政策的现状和对此类政策的态度。方法：从 2018 年 12 月 26 日到 2019 年 1 月 3 日，向韩国科学编辑委员会和韩国科学技术协会联合会的成员名录中列出的 1,055 人分发了一份调查问卷。调查包含四项关于受试者信息的项目，三项收集有关期刊的信息，另外两项关于采用或不采用数据共享政策的原因以及对此类政策的进一步意见。结果：在 100 名受访者（来自 100 家期刊）中，13 家表示他们的期刊已经采用了数据共享政策。该政策的强度仅在这 13 种期刊中的 10 种中得到推荐。采用数据共享政策的最常见原因是遵循国际趋势。两个期刊的存储库站点是Harvard Dataverse，一个是Mendeley Data。不采用数据共享政策的最常见原因是缺乏数据共享知识、提交者可能不想共享他们的数据，以及数据共享对科学发展的影响存在问题。结论：数据共享政策在韩国学术期刊中并不常见。编辑和研究人员应更积极地讨论采用此类政策的利弊。此外，