当前位置: X-MOL 学术Science Editing › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Solutions for identification problems: a look at the Research Organization Registry
Science Editing Pub Date : 2020-02-20 , DOI: 10.6087/kcse.192
Rachael Lammey

As DOIs and their associated metadata have been widely adopted in the research ecosystem to identify research outputs, there are still areas where identification of the full context or nature of these outputs is tricky, manual and therefore prone to mistakes. The first problem is one of identifying which organizations are affiliated with which research outputs. In other words, how can a research institution, like a university, easily see the publications and other outputs (such as data) that their researchers have produced? The second is identifying which grants resulted in which research outputs—how can a funder easily see the data, articles, preprints and more, connected to a specific project they funded? At the moment, reporting on both these areas is done manually, and relies on the researcher taking the time to let their institutions and funders know each time they publish an article. That time could be better spent doing research. There are also benefits for other stakeholders, including journals and publishers that having identifiers in place for organizations and grants will help accomplish.

中文翻译:

识别问题的解决方案:查看研究组织登记处

由于 DOI 及其相关元数据已在研究生态系统中广泛用于识别研究输出,因此在某些领域,识别这些输出的完整背景或性质是棘手的、手动的,因此容易出错。第一个问题是确定哪些组织隶属于哪些研究成果。换句话说,像大学这样的研究机构如何轻松查看其研究人员制作的出版物和其他产出(例如数据)?第二个是确定哪些赠款产生了哪些研究成果——资助者如何轻松查看与他们资助的特定项目相关的数据、文章、预印本等?目前,这两个领域的报告都是手动完成的,并且依赖于研究人员在每次发表文章时花时间让他们的机构和资助者知道。这段时间最好花在研究上。其他利益相关者也有好处,包括期刊和出版商,为组织和赠款设置标识符将有助于实现这一目标。
更新日期:2020-02-20
down
wechat
bug