当前位置: X-MOL 学术Science Editing › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research published in nursing journals
Science Editing Pub Date : 2020-08-20 , DOI: 10.6087/kcse.205
Juyeon Oh , Aekyung Kim

Purpose: This bibliometric study investigated the current state of documents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) published in nursing journals. The analysis focused on the description of most productive journals, institutions, and countries, as well as the characteristics of the documents. Methods: The publications analyzed in this study were retrieved from the Web of Science database with search keywords. The searches used to establish the study dataset were last updated on July 10, 2020. The inclusion criteria were relevant English-language publications in journals published in the Science Citation Index Expanded or Social Science Citation Index. Content analysis of original articles and reviews was done. Results: An analysis of 125 publications on COVID-19 from 48 journals showed that the most productive journal and country were the Journal of Clinical Nursing (n=18) and the USA (n=53), respectively. Original articles (n=27, 21.6%) and review papers (n=4, 3.2%) accounted for 24.8% of the articles, and the highest number of papers were found in early access (published ahead of print) (n=51, 40.8%) and Q1 journals (n=73, 58.4%). The content analysis found 10 data-based original articles or reviews, which dealt with the topics of nurse training (n=2), nurses' psychosocial status (n=2), nursing research methodology (n=1), nursing guidelines (n=4), and protection for nurses (n=1). Conclusion: This study presents the current situation of nursing research on COVID-19 based on an analysis of publications in nursing journals and provides meaningful information to nursing researchers and editorial board members. The number of data-based original articles on nursing related to COVID-19 remains low.

中文翻译:

对发表在护理期刊上的 COVID-19 研究的文献计量分析

目的:这项文献计量研究调查了发表在护理期刊上的关于 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 的文献的现状。分析的重点是对最具生产力的期刊、机构和国家的描述,以及文件的特征。方法:本研究中分析的出版物使用搜索关键字从 Web of Science 数据库中检索。用于建立研究数据集的搜索最后更新于 2020 年 7 月 10 日。纳入标准是在科学引文索引扩展或社会科学引文索引中发表的期刊中的相关英文出版物。对原始文章和评论进行了内容分析。结果:对 48 种期刊中关于 COVID-19 的 125 篇出版物的分析表明,产量最高的期刊和国家分别是 Journal of Clinical Nursing(n=18)和美国(n=53)。原创文章 (n=27, 21.6%) 和评论文章 (n=4, 3.2%) 占文章总数的 24.8%,其中早期访问(提前出版)的论文数量最多(n=51 , 40.8%) 和 Q1 期刊 (n=73, 58.4%)。内容分析发现10篇基于数据的原创文章或评论,涉及护士培训(n=2)、护士心理社会状况(n=2)、护理研究方法(n=1)、护理指南(n =4),以及对护士的保护 (n=1)。结论:本研究基于对护理期刊出版物的分析,介绍了 COVID-19 护理研究的现状,并为护理研究人员和编辑委员会成员提供了有意义的信息。与 COVID-19 相关的基于数据的护理原创文章数量仍然很少。
更新日期:2020-08-20
down
wechat
bug