Orientation: Research communicated in this article contributes to the fields of neuroleadership and work engagement, and explores the use of Integral Theory’s All Quadrants All Lines (AQAL) four-quadrant model. It also applies the General Method of Theory-Building research in applied disciplines. Research purpose: The aim of this article is to determine the role that neuroleadership plays in improving work engagement. Motivation for the study: Human resource development lacks focus in theoretical research because of a lack of clarity of the connections between research and practice and a lack of interest in abstract theoretical issues (Storberg-Walker, 2006 ). Recent technological advances providing an insight into the biological and physiological bases of social interaction have presented new information on being engaged at work. Research approach/design and method: The researcher applied the General Method of Theory-Building in applied disciplines to structure the qualitative research approach (Lynham, 2002 ). Main findings: Findings deduced from the case study show how organisations apply work engagement. Findings from meta-triangulation and bracketing present an EngageInMind framework for neuroleadership and work engagement. Overall findings confirmed that the EngageInMind framework is relevant and can be applied. Findings further include the review of the application in business and recommendations for improvement. Practical/managerial implications: The insights derived from this research propose that neuroleadership improves work engagement through its psychological, neurobiological, sociological and organisational dimensions, as presented in the EngageInMind framework. Contribution/value-add: The EngageInMind framework is the key contribution of this article.

中文翻译：

---

神经领导力在工作参与中的作用

方向：本文交流的研究有助于神经领导力和工作投入领域，并探讨了积分理论的“所有象限所有系”（AQAL）四象限模型的使用。它还在应用学科中应用了“理论构建研究的一般方法”。研究目的：本文的目的是确定神经领导力在改善工作投入方面的作用。研究动机：由于缺乏研究与实践之间的联系以及对抽象理论问题的兴趣，人力资源开发缺乏对理论研究的关注（Storberg-Walker，2006）。最近的技术进步提供了对社会互动的生物学和生理学基础的洞察力，从而为从事工作提供了新的信息。研究方法/设计和方法：研究人员在应用学科中应用了“理论构建的一般方法”来构造定性研究方法（Lynham，2002）。主要发现：从案例研究中得出的发现表明组织如何应用工作投入。从元三角测量和方括号中得出的结果为神经领导力和工作投入提供了一个EngageInMind框架。总体结果证实，EngageInMind框架是相关的并且可以应用。调查结果还包括对业务中应用程序的审查和改进建议。实际/管理意义：这项研究得出的见解表明，神经领导力可以通过其心理，神经生物学，社会学和组织维度来改善工作投入，如EngageInMind框架中所述。贡献/增值：EngageInMind框架是本文的主要贡献。