Introduction: Since ancient times, scholars points out effectiveness of horseback riding not only for utilitarian use, but also as form of therapy for less healthy part of society. Enlightenment age scholars started to make treaties about use of such therapy and this trend is now developing not only for physical disabilities, but also for mentally ill patients. The purpose of this study is to determine trends of interest in horseback riding therapy interventions among different groups of neurocognitive disorders among different populations of people and its comparison to prevalence of such disorders. Material and methods: Web of Science, Pubmed and Scopus databased were screened using filter with algorithm of “horseback therapy” , “horse back therapy”, ”hippotherapy” and “equine therapy”. Results were screened for appropriateness and relevance, then based on this end-filtering, papers were grouped regarding specificity of neurocognitive aspect of disorders. Results: 595 entries in Web of Science, 516 entries in Scopus and 123 results in Pubmed. Overall, 272 entries were subtracted. Conclusions: This analysis shows that most interest in such kind of therapy is focused on neurological disorders, especially with ones with cerebral palsy. There is no correlation between prevalence of selected disorders and amount of related papers.

中文翻译：

---

对神经认知障碍患者的骑马疗法干预措施的兴趣度：在线科学数据库中文献的定量分析

简介：自古以来，学者们指出骑马的有效性不仅是功利用途，而且是社会不健康人群的一种治疗形式。启蒙时代的学者开始就使用这种疗法制定条约，这种趋势现在不仅针对身体残疾，而且也针对精神病患者。这项研究的目的是确定不同人群中不同类别的神经认知障碍之间对骑马疗法进行干预的兴趣趋势及其与此类疾病患病率的比较。资料和方法：使用具有“马背疗法”，“马背疗法”，“河马疗法”和“马疗法”算法的过滤器筛选Web of Science，Pubmed和Scopus数据库。筛选结果的适当性和相关性，然后基于此最终筛选，将有关疾病的神经认知方面的特异性的论文进行分组。结果：Web of Science中有595个条目，Scopus中有516个条目，Pubmed中有123个结果。总体而言，减去了272个条目。结论：该分析表明，这种疗法的大多数兴趣集中在神经系统疾病，尤其是脑瘫患者。所选疾病的患病率与相关论文的数量之间没有关联。特别是患有脑瘫的人。所选疾病的患病率与相关论文的数量之间没有关联。特别是患有脑瘫的人。所选疾病的患病率与相关论文的数量之间没有关联。