当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Applied Social Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
An attribution‐emotion‐action interpretation of the “evil eye” in everyday conflict situations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology ( IF 2.654 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-01 , DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12743
Maria Esperanza Vargas 1
Affiliation  

An attribution‐emotion‐action model was used to examine individuals’ willingness to seek for another person's face in conflict situations. To induce interpersonal conflict and frustration, participants were engaged in the ultimatum bargaining game (UBG) where they received predetermined offers. A simple UBG consists of two players, a Proposer and a Responder, who must decide how to divide a resource. Our findings confirm our predictions in that during the interpersonal conflict (i.e., betraying the norm of equality in the UBG), participants made more controllable based attributions, felt more frustrated (less sympathetic), and more likely requested to view the Proposer's photograph than when there is no conflict. Stated differently, in conflict situations, the likelihood of seeking another person's face increases when controllable attributions are made and when frustration is felt.

中文翻译:

日常冲突情况下“邪恶之眼”的归因-情感-行为解释

归因-情感-行为模型用于检验个人在冲突情况下寻求他人面孔的意愿。为了引起人际冲突和挫败感,参与者参加了最后通bar的讨价还价游戏(UBG),并在其中收到了预定的要约。一个简单的UBG由两个参与者组成,即提议者和响应者,他们必须决定如何划分资源。我们的发现证实了我们的预测,即在人际冲突期间(即违反了UBG中的平等规范),参与者的可控归因更加可控,感到沮丧(较少同情),并且比起当时更可能要求查看提议者的照片没有冲突。换句话说,在冲突情况下,寻求他人帮助的可能性
更新日期:2021-02-01
down
wechat
bug