Subjective well-being valuation has recently grown in use with applications in the fields of environment, health, and cultural heritage. With this methodology values are based on how non-market goods impact on self-reported measures of well-being such as life satisfaction. Despite the differences in theoretical foundations of subjective well-being and preference-based valuation methods, recent applications have attempted to integrate both approaches without the complete understanding of the effects of subjective well-being on stated preference elicitation. The present study investigates the extent to which subjective well-being impacts the responses to a choice experiment in Norway. The results indicate that momentary subjective well-being does not induce a higher level of randomness in the stated choices but rather affects the preferences for attribute. We also find that self-reported well-being measures respond differently to the cost attribute in the choice experiment. Furthermore, we compute marginal willingness-to-pays for various subjective well-being categories and discuss the implications of these results for an integrated modelling of subjective well-being and preference-based valuation methods.

主观幸福感评估最近在环境，健康和文化遗产领域的应用中得到了越来越多的应用。通过这种方法，价值基于非市场商品如何影响自我报告的幸福感（例如生活满意度）。尽管主观幸福感和基于偏好的评估方法在理论基础上存在差异，但最近的应用尝试在不完全了解主观幸福感对陈述的偏好激发的影响的情况下将这两种方法整合在一起。本研究调查了主观幸福感在多大程度上影响了挪威对选择实验的反应。结果表明，瞬时主观幸福感不会在陈述的选择中引起较高的随机性，而是会影响对属性的偏好。我们还发现，自我报告的幸福感测验在选择实验中对成本属性的反应不同。此外，我们计算了各种主观幸福感类别的边际支付意愿，并讨论了这些结果对主观幸福感和基于偏好的评估方法的集成建模的含义。