ABSTRACT

This review addresses multicomponent theories of hypnotizability by focusing on 3 important exemplars from the history of hypnosis research: E. R. Hilgard’s (1965) Hypnotic susceptibility; R. E. Shor’s (1962) Three dimensions of hypnotic depth; and T.X. Barber’s (1999) A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. Taken together, they illustrate the variety of hypnotic phenomena examined in research – overt responses, subjective experiences, and underlying processes – and the ways in which evidence about each has implied the existence of multiple underlying components. Particularly highlighted are the different ways in which the theories conceptualize the joint contribution of multiple individual differences. Also covered is relevant later work by other researchers as well as important issues remaining to be resolved.

摘要

本综述通过关注催眠研究史上的 3 个重要范例来阐述催眠性的多组分理论：ER Hilgard's (1965) Hypnotic susceptibility；RE Shor (1962)催眠深度的三个维度；和 TX Barber (1999)催眠的综合三维理论. 综合起来，它们说明了研究中检查的各种催眠现象——明显的反应、主观体验和潜在的过程——以及关于每种现象的证据暗示存在多个潜在成分的方式。特别突出的是理论将多个个体差异的共同贡献概念化的不同方式。还涵盖了其他研究人员的相关后期工作以及尚待解决的重要问题。