In defending a new framework for incorporating metacognitive debiasing strategies into critical thinking education, Jeffrey Maynes (2015; 2017) draws on ecological rationality theory to argue that in felicitous environments, agents will achieve greater epistemic success by relying on heuristics rather than more ideally rational procedures. He considers a challenge presented by Mercier and Sperber’s (2011; 2017) “interactionist” thesis that individual biases contribute to successful group reasoning. I argue that the challenge can be met without assuming an individualist ideal of the critical thinker as a solitary reasoner. Focusing on cognitive laziness and myside bias, I then argue that a more complete reckoning with the implications of interactionism about reasoning will require us to transcend individualism more fully to embrace the selection, design, regulation, and navigation of dialogic environments as central pedagogical aims of critical thinking education.

中文翻译：

---

来吧，让我们一起推理

在捍卫将元认知去偏见策略纳入批判性思维教育的新框架时，Jeffrey Maynes (2015; 2017) 借鉴生态理性理论认为，在适宜的环境中，代理人将通过依赖启发式而不是更理想的理性程序获得更大的认知成功. 他考虑了 Mercier 和 Sperber（2011 年；2017 年）“互动主义”论文提出的挑战，即个人偏见有助于成功的群体推理。我认为，无需将批判性思想家的个人主义理想假设为孤独的推理者，就可以应对挑战。专注于认知懒惰和我的偏见，然后我认为，更全面地考虑互动主义对推理的影响将要求我们更全面地超越个人主义以接受选择，