The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory assumes that people engaged in argumentative discourse manoeuvre strategically. In argumentative reality, the strategic manoeuvring is often carried out according to an argumentative strategy. Language users make an effort to present their strategic manoeuvres in a specific way and the analysis of the stylistic choices in actual argumentative discourse is the most important basis for identification and analysis of argumentative strategies. In this article, it is shown what requirements must be satisfied by a systematic stylistic analysis of argumentative discourse, and the results of such an analysis are illustrated by means of a case study.

中文翻译：

---

论证策略和文体装置

扩展的语用辩证论证理论假设人们从事论证话语的策略是策略性的。在争论的现实中，战略操作往往是根据争论的策略进行的。语言使用者力求以一种特定的方式呈现自己的策略策略，对实际议论文中文体选择的分析是识别和分析议论文策略的最重要依据。本文通过对议论文的系统文体分析表明必须满足哪些要求，并通过案例研究来说明这种分析的结果。