In response to commentaries by Eckstein and Kisicek, I argue that the study of auditory arguments is very much in keeping with the critical thinking (and epistemological) ideals that motivate informal logic. In the process I support further research on sound figures and the meaning of sound (and a possible “auditory dictionary”) that would enhance our ability to analyze auditory arguments.

中文翻译：

---

声音在非正式逻辑中的位置如何？

针对 Eckstein 和 Kisicek 的评论，我认为对听觉论证的研究非常符合激发非正式逻辑的批判性思维（和认识论）理想。在这个过程中，我支持进一步研究声音数字和声音的含义（以及可能的“听觉词典”），这将增强我们分析听觉争论的能力。