当前位置: X-MOL 学术Informal Logic › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Issues of Logicism and Objectivity
Informal Logic Pub Date : 2017-09-11 , DOI: 10.22329/il.v37i3.4832
Trudy Govier

Concerning Harald Wohlrapp’s theories, many fascinating issues arise. I shall concentrate here on aspects especially relevant to the treatment of pro and con argumentation, a type of what has been called conductive argument. Though initially intrigued by my efforts to describe and explore conductive argument, Harald Wohlrapp later concluded that my treatments were seriously flawed and that an alternative approach can serve to replace that problematic and much contested conception. Much of the difference between our approaches concerns what he deems to be a logicistic approach (referred to here as logicism) on my part.

中文翻译:

逻辑主义和客观性问题

关于 Harald Wohlrapp 的理论,出现了许多引人入胜的问题。我将在这里集中讨论与处理赞成和反对论证特别相关的方面,这是一种所谓的传导论证。尽管最初对我描述和探索传导性论证的努力很感兴趣,但 Harald Wohlrapp 后来得出结论,我的治疗方法存在严重缺陷,并且可以使用替代方法来取代这种有问题且备受争议的概念。我们的方法之间的大部分差异与他认为是我认为的逻辑主义方法(在此称为逻辑主义)有关。
更新日期:2017-09-11
down
wechat
bug