ABSTRACT

The global rise of hyper-partisan media, especially on the political right, has been receiving increasing scholarly attention in the past years. In contrast to discarding these media as mere producers of fake news, this paper studies them as a case of alternative news media and thus as a self-proclaimed corrective to a perceived media mainstream. By focusing on the case of Denmark, where the public debate generally has been described as very open, the paper sheds light on the alternative character of these media in an environment that does not shun radical voices and viewpoints. Based on a qualitative content analysis of the entire website and article content published by five right-wing alternative news media in April 2019, the paper shows that Danish right-wing alternative media resist normalization at the structural level, but appear only moderately antagonistic and anti-hegemonic at the level of article content.

摘要

在过去的几年中，超党派媒体的全球崛起，尤其是在政治权利方面，已受到越来越多的学术关注。与将这些媒体仅作为伪造新闻的产生者相比，本文将它们作为替代新闻媒体的案例进行研究，从而作为自称为媒体主流主流的纠正措施。通过关注丹麦的情况，丹麦的公众辩论通常被描述为非常公开的，从而阐明了在不回避激进声音和观点的环境中这些媒体的替代性特征。根据对整个网站的定性内容分析和2019年4月五个右翼替代新闻媒体发布的文章内容，该论文显示丹麦右翼替代媒体在结构层面上无法规范化，