Many countries adhere to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development creed that innovation is good for the economy. Experiments are often used to intentionally create space for innovation. Decisions allowing experiments result in temporary legal enclaves for a few, excluding many others. Therefore, they come with risks. The aim of this article is to provide a set of guidelines that help improve the legal resilience of experimentation policies, so they are better able to withstand legal attacks when they occur. To do so, we first arranged the existing diversity of legal experiments in a theoretical model. Special attention was paid to two archetypes of legal experiments: statutory experiments and regulatory sandboxes. Second, we analyzed the impact of both types of experiments on four core legal principles: legality, certainty, equality, and public accountability. From this assessment, we eventually formulated a set of guidelines to secure or improve legal resilience.

中文翻译：

---

作为创新产品测试环境的法律飞地：走向具有法律弹性的实验政策1

许多国家坚持经济合作与发展组织的信条，即创新有利于经济。实验经常被用来有意地为创新创造空间。允许实验的决定导致少数人的临时合法飞地，排除许多其他人。因此，它们伴随着风险。本文的目的是提供一套指导方针，帮助提高实验政策的法律弹性，以便它们在发生法律攻击时能够更好地抵御。为此，我们首先在一个理论模型中安排了现有的法律实验多样性。法律实验的两种原型受到了特别关注：法定实验和监管沙箱。其次，我们分析了两种类型的实验对四个核心法律原则的影响：合法性、确定性、平等和公共责任。根据这项评估，我们最终制定了一套指导方针，以确保或提高法律弹性。