当前位置: X-MOL 学术Science and Engineering Ethics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review
Science and Engineering Ethics ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-27 , DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1
Rea Ščepanović 1 , Krishma Labib 2 , Ivan Buljan 1 , Joeri Tijdink 2, 3 , Ana Marušić 1
Affiliation  

Research integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases and reference lists of selected articles identified a total of 92 documents while the search of grey literature sources identified 118 documents for analysis. The retrieved documents were analysed based on their geographical origin, research field and organisational origin (RPO or RFO) of RI practices, types of guidance presented in them, and target groups to which RI practices are directed. Most of the identified practices were developed for research in general, and are applicable to all research fields (n = 117) and medical sciences (n = 78). They were mostly written in the form of guidelines (n = 136) and targeted researchers (n = 167). A comprehensive search of the existing RI promotion practices showed that initiatives mostly come from RPOs while only a few RI practices originate from RFOs. This study showed that more RI guidance documents are needed for natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities since only a small number of documents was developed specifically for these research fields. The explored documents and the gaps in knowledge identified in this study can be used for further development of RI promotion practices in RPOs and RFOs.



中文翻译:

研究执行组织和研究资助组织中促进研究诚信的实践:范围界定审查

研究诚信 (RI) 是一个不断发展的概念,人们越来越重视创建 RI 推广实践。本研究旨在绘制研究执行组织 (RPO) 和研究资助组织 (RFO) 现有的 RI 指导文件。对书目数据库和灰色文献来源进行了检索,并对检索到的文档进行了资格筛选。对书目数据库和选定文章的参考文献列表的搜索总共识别出 92 篇文档,而对灰色文献来源的搜索则识别出 118 篇文档进行分析。根据 RI 实践的地理起源、研究领域和组织起源(RPO 或 RFO)、其中提出的指南类型以及 RI 实践所针对的目标群体对检索到的文件进行分析。大多数已确定的实践是为一般研究而开发的,适用于所有研究领域 (n = 117) 和医学科学 (n = 78)。它们大多以指南(n = 136)和目标研究人员(n = 167)的形式编写。对现有 RI 推广实践的全面考察表明,大部分举措来自 RPO,只有少数 RI 实践源自 RFO。本研究表明,自然科学、社会科学和人文学科需要更多的 RI 指导文件,因为专门针对这些研究领域制定的文件数量很少。本研究中探索的文件和确定的知识差距可用于进一步开发 RPO 和 RFO 中的 RI 推广实践。

更新日期:2021-01-28
down
wechat
bug