Violence Against Women ( IF 2.586 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-28 , DOI: 10.1177/1077801220985932 Brittany Patafio 1 , Peter Miller 1 , Arlene Walker 1 , Kerri Coomber 1 , Ashlee Curtis 1 , Gery Karantzas 1 , Richelle Mayshak 1 , Nicholas Taylor 1 , Shannon Hyder 1
This study explores two approaches to measuring coercive controlling behaviors (CCBs)—counting how many different CCB types and examining the frequency of each CCB experienced—to examine their utility in explaining the relationship between CCBs and physical intimate partner violence (IPV). Australian women aged 18–68 years (n = 739; Mage = 31.58, SDage = 11.76) completed an online survey. Count and frequency CCB approaches yielded similar significant associations with increased physical IPV. Both approaches suggest that frightening behaviors in particular are significantly indicative of also experiencing physical IPV; however, when you count CCB types, public name-calling becomes important, whereas when you examine the frequency of each CCB type, jealousy/possessiveness becomes important. These findings suggest differential utility between measures of CCBs, which examine the frequency of specific CCB types and which count CCB types, and that both approaches are useful in understanding how coercion and control relate to physical violence within intimate relationships.
中文翻译:
澳大利亚女性的强制控制行为和报告身体亲密伴侣暴力:一项探索
本研究探讨了两种测量强制控制行为 (CCB) 的方法——计算有多少不同的 CCB 类型并检查每个 CCB 经历的频率——以检验它们在解释 CCB 与身体亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 之间关系方面的效用。18-68 岁的澳大利亚女性(n = 739;M年龄= 31.58,SD年龄= 11.76) 完成了在线调查。计数和频率 CCB 方法与增加的物理 IPV 产生了类似的显着关联。这两种方法都表明,特别是可怕的行为显着表明也经历了物理 IPV;但是,当您计算 CCB 类型时,公开辱骂变得很重要,而当您检查每种 CCB 类型的频率时,嫉妒/占有欲就变得很重要。这些发现表明 CCB 测量之间的不同效用,检查特定 CCB 类型的频率和计算 CCB 类型的频率,并且这两种方法都有助于理解强迫和控制如何与亲密关系中的身体暴力相关。