The Chilean dictatorship reacted to the international condemnation with a resignification of its international discourse in areas of Human Rights that it considered innocuous, such as decolonisation, apartheid, religious tolerance and -as we suggest- women's rights. The article seeks to determine the key representations elaborated by the dictatorship, through a discourse analysis, and a post-structuralist approach in International Relations. Its findings show that in the area of women's rights there existed a clear contradiction between the internal and international narrative on the part of the dictatorship, with a support for feminist ideas in the international sphere and a hostile opposition against them in the domestic one. For the evaluation of the consequences of this practice, the analysis uses the boomerang model, looking at the impact of the contradiction on the strength not only of the human's rights movement, but also the women's rights one. In turn, it evaluates the effect that the latter had on the dictatorship policies and discourse.

智利的独裁政权对国际谴责作出了反应，对它认为是无害的人权领域的国际话语表示了重新的重视，例如非殖民化，种族隔离，宗教宽容和（如我们建议的）妇女权利。本文力求通过话语分析和国际关系中的后结构主义方法，确定独裁政权所阐述的主要表现形式。调查结果表明，在妇女权利领域，独裁统治的内部和国际叙事之间存在明显的矛盾，在国际领域支持女权主义思想，而在国内则反对它们。为了评估这种做法的后果，该分析使用了回旋镖模型，着眼于矛盾对人权运动力量的影响，以及对妇女权利运动的影响。反过来，它评估了后者对专政政策和话语的影响。