Hate speech is one of the most important conceptual categories in anti‐oppression politics today; a great deal of energy and political will is devoted to identifying, characterizing, contesting, and (sometimes) penalizing hate speech. However, despite the increasing inclusion of gender identity as a socially salient trait, antipatriarchal politics has largely been absent within this body of scholarship. Figuring out how to properly situate patriarchy‐enforcing speech within the category of hate speech is therefore an important politico‐philosophical project. My aim in this article is twofold: first, I argue that sexist speech, though oppressive, is not hate speech. Second, I argue that misogynistic speech is hate speech, even when it is intradivisional (that is, when it targets only subsets of women). This is important because recognizing that the concept hate speech applies to certain forms of patriarchy‐enforcing speech is another step in clarifying what is wrong with the practice, and how bad it is in relation to other abuses. Consequently, this article provides a more nuanced account of the kinds of expressions that can and should count as instances of hate speech.

中文翻译：

---

女人憎恨：关于厌恶，性别歧视和仇恨言论

仇恨言论是当今反压迫政治中最重要的概念类别之一；大量的精力和政治意愿致力于识别，定性，争论和（有时）惩罚仇恨言论。然而，尽管越来越多地将性别认同作为社会的显着特征，但在这个学术体系中反父权制政治却基本上不存在。因此，弄清如何在仇恨言论范畴内适当地安置父权制言论是一项重要的政治哲学项目。我在这篇文章中的目的是双重的：首先，我认为性别歧视言论虽然压迫性，但并不仇恨言论。其次，我认为，厌恶女性的言论是仇恨言论，即使它是部门内部的（即仅针对女性的一部分）。仇恨言论适用于某些形式的父权制-强化言论是澄清习俗出了什么问题以及与其他滥用行为有多严重的另一步骤。因此，本文更详细地介绍了可以并且应该算作仇恨言论实例的各种表达方式。