New data-driven technologies yield benefits and potentials, but also confront different agents and stakeholders with challenges in retaining control over their data. Our goal in this study is to arrive at a clear picture of what is meant by data sovereignty in such problem settings. To this end, we review 341 publications and analyze the frequency of different notions such as data sovereignty, digital sovereignty, and cyber sovereignty. We go on to map agents they concern, in which context they appear, and which values they allude to. While our sample reveals a considerable degree of divergence and an occasional lack of clarity about intended meanings of data sovereignty, we propose a conceptual grid to systematize different dimensions and connotations. Each of them relates in some way to meaningful control, ownership, and other claims to data articulated by a variety of agents ranging from individuals to countries. Data sovereignty alludes to a nuanced mixture of normative concepts such as inclusive deliberation and recognition of the fundamental rights of data subjects.

新的数据驱动技术带来了好处和潜力，但在保持对数据的控制权方面也面临着不同的代理商和利益相关者的挑战。我们在这项研究中的目标是清楚了解此类问题中数据主权的含义。为此，我们审查了341种出版物，并分析了不同概念的出现频率，例如数据主权，数字主权和网络主权。我们继续绘制他们所关注的代理，它们出现在什么环境中以及哪些值的映射他们暗示。尽管我们的样本显示出相当程度的分歧，并且偶尔对数据主权的预期含义缺乏清晰性，但我们提出了一个概念网格来将不同的维度和内涵系统化。它们中的每一个都以某种方式与有意义的控制权，所有权和对由个人到国家的各种代理人表达的数据的其他主张有关。数据主权暗示着规范性概念的细微混合，例如包容性审议和对数据主体基本权利的承认。