Reviews are essential for the sustainable development of research, as evidenced by their higher citation rates compared to other types of publications. The literature on the typification of reviews is analyzed; the role of reviews in the general flow of scientific publications is characterized, including by scientific trends; and hypotheses about factors affecting the citation of scientific publications in general and reviews in particular are accumulated. To confirm the hypotheses and determine the degree of influence of individual factors, a correlation and regression analysis of the selected array of scientific reviews has been carried out. As a result, the influence of ten factors is shown. The most significant of them are the rating of the journal, the age of the article, the bibliography length, the language in which the review is written, and the average Hirsch index of the authors.

中文翻译：

---

查看引文因素

评论对于研究的可持续发展至关重要，与其他类型的出版物相比，评论的引用率更高就证明了这一点。分析了关于评论类型化的文献；评论在科学出版物总体流程中的作用是有特点的，包括科学趋势；并且关于影响一般科学出版物引用的因素，特别是评论的假设被积累起来。为了确认假设并确定单个因素的影响程度，对选定的一系列科学评论进行了相关性和回归分析。结果，显示了十个因素的影响。其中最重要的是期刊评级、文章年龄、参考书目长度、撰写评论的语言、