In this article, I defend my previous argument that natural divine causation suffers under the problem of causal overdetermination and that it cannot serve as a line of demarcation between theistic evolution (TE) and intelligent design (ID). I do this in light of Christoffer Skogholt's critique of my article. I argue that Skogholt underestimates the naturalistic ambitions of some current thinkers in TE and fails, therefore, to adequately respond to my main argument. I also outline how partial causation better serves as a model for the relationship between God's providence and evolution.

中文翻译：

---

自然神致的问题和部分因果的好处：对斯科霍特的回应

在本文中，我捍卫了我以前的论点，即自然的因果关系会因因果关系确定问题而遭受苦难，并且它不能充当有神论的进化论（TE）与智能设计（ID）之间的界线。我是根据Christoffer Skogholt对我的文章的评论来做的。我认为斯科格霍尔特低估了TE中一些当前思想家的自然主义野心，因此未能充分回应我的主要论点。我还概述了部分因果关系如何更好地充当上帝的天意与进化之间关系的模型。