当前位置: X-MOL 学术History and Theory › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
HARTOG, KOSELLECK, AND RICOEUR: HISTORICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND THE CRISIS OF THE PRESENT
History and Theory ( IF 0.718 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-11 , DOI: 10.1111/hith.12123
TERENCE HOLDEN 1
Affiliation  

I enquire here into whether historical anthropology may serve to orient the critique of modes of temporalization under the conditions specific to what François Hartog designates as the contemporary regime of historicity. To this end, I bring Hartog into conversation with Paul Ricoeur: both arrive at a diagnosis of the crisis of the present on the basis of a parallel interiorization of the metahistorical categories of Reinhart Koselleck. Sharing a common interlocutor, the diagnoses at which they arrive are nevertheless quite different in nature, a result of the way in which these categories are inflected alternatively toward the anthropological perspective of fundamental temporalization and the semantic perspective of articulation at the level of “orders of time.” I suggest that the crisis of the present eludes the grasp of both and, with a view to gaining a more secure critical purchase over this crisis, propose a framework for bringing them into conversation.

中文翻译:

HARTOG,KOSELLECK和RICOEUR:历史人类学和当前的危机

我在此询问,在弗朗索瓦·哈托格(FrançoisHartog)指定为当代历史性制度的特定条件下,历史人类学是否可以用来指导对时态模式的批判。为此,我将哈托格与保罗·里科(Paul Ricoeur)进行了交谈:两者都是在对莱因哈特·科塞莱克(Reinhart Koselleck)的元历史学类别进行平行内部化的基础上,对当前的危机做出诊断。共享一个共同的对话者,他们到达的诊断本质上是完全不同的,这是因为这些类别交替地向基本时态化的人类学视角和发音的语义视角转变为“顺序”层次的结果。时间。” 我认为,当前的危机使双方都无法把握,
更新日期:2019-09-11
down
wechat
bug