In this article, I raise a question and acknowledge a ‘feminist debt’. The ‘feminist debt’ is to the politics of location, and the question asks: what particular stipulations and enablements does a critical reflexive feminist politics of location put in place for knowledge production and for doing feminist theory? I suggest that there are at least three stipulations/enablements that a critical reflexive politics of location puts in place for knowledge production. Firstly, it demands/enables scholarly accounts to reveal their location within the prevailing entanglements of power relations and to highlight the politics of struggle that underpin these. Secondly, it demands/enables conceptual work from different geographical spaces – and in particular, it facilitates the production of conceptual work in non-standard background contexts and conditions. And finally, a critical reflexive politics of location demands/enables a methodological response to capture the different conceptual and analytical and empirical knowledges produced in different locations.

中文翻译：

---

地点、“女权主义债务”和来自全球南方的思考的批判性反思政治

在这篇文章中，我提出一个问题并承认“女权主义债务”。“女权主义债务”是针对地域政治的，问题在于：批判性反思性女性主义地域政治为知识生产和女权主义理论制定了哪些特定的规定和支持？我建议至少有三个规定/使能，关键的反思性地点政治为知识生产实施。首先，它要求/使学术说明能够揭示它们在权力关系的普遍纠缠中的位置，并突出支撑这些纠缠的斗争政治。其次，它要求/支持来自不同地理空间的概念性工作——特别是，它促进了在非标准背景环境和条件下的概念性工作的产生。