In recent years, international actors have promoted international norms related to sustainable and inclusive resource governance. However, we know little about how such attempts are contested and adapted in domestic reform processes. Drawing on insights from norm diffusion and institutionalist theories, this article traces how first bilateral aid agencies and then OECD have influenced the institutionalisation of a contested land‐use planning (LUP) reform in Peru from 1990 until 2017. Based on 145 interviews and written primary sources, we demonstrate that aid agencies have partially empowered policy coalitions (e.g., civil society and subnational actors) in favour of LUP, whereas OECD's interventions have favoured national elites opposed to LUP. In both cases, we argue that by failing to foresee the political resistance among economic actors and national elites, international actors have contributed to the weakening and elite capture of LUP. Hence, our analysis represents a case of weakly institutionalized norms. The findings extend the existing literature on extractive governance by providing a fine‐grained analysis of the process in which national elites and societal coalitions domesticate the institutionalisation of international norms for sustainable and inclusive resource governance. Our findings have broader implications for debates about extractive governance as well as policy strategies for promoting institutional change in resource‐rich middle‐income countries.

中文翻译：

---

为可持续资源治理制定国际准则的国内化：秘鲁的精英捕获

近年来，国际行为体促进了与可持续和包容性资源治理有关的国际规范。但是，我们对这种尝试如何在国内改革过程中进行争辩和调整知之甚少。本文基于规范传播和制度主义理论的见解，追溯了1990年至2017年间双边援助机构以及经合组织如何对秘鲁有争议的土地利用规划（LUP）改革的制度化产生了影响。基于145次访谈和书面初稿资料表明，援助机构已部分支持政策联盟（例如民间社会和地方行动者），以支持LUP，而OECD的干预则偏向反对LUP的国家精英。在这两种情况下 我们认为，由于未能预见经济行为者和国家精英之间的政治阻力，国际行为者导致了LUP的削弱和精英化。因此，我们的分析代表了制度化制度薄弱的情况。这些发现通过对国家精英和社会联盟将国际规范的制度化本土化以实现可持续和包容性资源治理的过程进行了细致的分析，从而扩展了有关采掘治理的现有文献。我们的发现对有关资源丰富的中等收入国家的采掘治理以及促进机构变革的政策策略的辩论具有更广泛的意义。我们的分析代表了制度化制度薄弱的情况。这些发现通过对国家精英和社会联盟将国际规范的制度化本土化以实现可持续和包容性资源治理的过程进行了细致的分析，从而扩展了有关采掘治理的现有文献。我们的发现对有关资源丰富的中等收入国家的采掘治理以及促进机构变革的政策策略的辩论具有更广泛的意义。我们的分析代表了制度化制度薄弱的情况。这些发现通过对国家精英和社会联盟将国际规范的制度化本土化以实现可持续和包容性资源治理的过程进行了细致的分析，从而扩展了有关采掘治理的现有文献。我们的发现对有关资源丰富的中等收入国家的采掘治理以及促进机构变革的政策策略的辩论具有更广泛的意义。