“Local participation” and “national ownership” are widely endorsed ideals in development discourse and practice. With the former referring to people’s active involvement in development‐related activities with some form of external input, and the latter to aid‐recipient countries’ policy independence in relation to foreign funders, both are concerned with the inherent inequality of aid relationships. In development policy, the two also tend to be used interchangeably and in combination, apparently assumed to go hand in hand, with increased national ownership expected to be conducive to local participation.

中文翻译：

---

当国家所有权增强时，地方参与会发生什么？开始在卢旺达和柬埔寨的勘探

在发展论述和实践中，“地方参与”和“国家所有权”被广泛认可。前者指的是人们以某种​​形式的外部投入积极参与与发展有关的活动，而后者指的是受援国相对于外国资助者的政策独立性，两者都与援助关系的内在不平等有关。在发展政策中，这两者往往也可以互换使用，并且结合起来使用，显然假定是相辅相成的，随着国家所有权的增加，有利于地方参与。