If it had been built, the Fairfield Renewable Energy Project would have been the largest trash incinerator in the United States, burning 4,000 tons of waste each day in late‐industrial Baltimore. When it was first proposed, two discourses of renewal coalesced around the project. One was propagated by technocrats who argued incineration should be regulated as a renewable technology. Another emerged among working‐class whites who hoped the plant would reinvigorate their ailing economy. Both discourses hinged on comparisons with the past and maneuvers between futures near and far, gaining ground through subjunctive politics. Recast in this light, both technocratic dreams and local narratives of waste, race, and decline betray a deep ambivalence about the sorts of futures that seem plausible within a geography of “undesirables.” [subjunctive politics, waste, race, renewal, future, uncertainty, environment, Baltimore, United States]

中文翻译：

---

浪费能源：

如果建成，费尔菲尔德可再生能源项目将是美国最大的垃圾焚烧炉，每天在工业化后期的巴尔的摩燃烧4000吨废物。最初提出该方案时，围绕该项目合并了两种更新方式。一种是由技术官僚传播的，他们认为焚烧应该作为一种可再生技术进行管理。工人阶级白人中还出现了另一个人，他们希望这种植物能够重振经济不景气的地方。两种论述都取决于与过去的比较以及近距离和远期之间的回旋，这是通过虚拟政治获得的。。从这种角度出发，技术官僚主义的梦想以及对浪费，种族和衰落的本地叙事都背离了对在“不合需要的人”的地理范围内看似合理的未来的种种矛盾。[虚拟虚拟政治，浪费，种族，更新，未来，不确定因素，环境，巴尔的摩，美国]