In “Reconsidering the Industrial Revolution: England and Wales,” Wrigley omits vital information from the section “Urban Growth and Agricultural Change.” Arguing that by 1800, English agriculture was able to provide not only food for the rising population but also raw material for the industries, he cites wool and leather as the two largest industries in terms of value added in 1801 and leaves out building and cotton entirely. Therein lies the problem.

中文翻译：

---

箭牌公司“重新考虑工业革命”中的数据遗漏

在“重新考虑工业革命：英格兰和威尔士”中，箭牌省略了“城市增长与农业变化”部分中的重要信息。他认为到1800年，英国的农业不仅能够为不断增长的人口提供食物，而且还能为工业提供原料，他将羊毛和皮革视为1801年增加值的两个最大产业，并完全忽略了建筑和棉花。问题就出在这里。