In 2013 the passage of France’s “marriage for all” law broadened the institution of marriage and extended its political privileges, but a refusal by the French government to accept medically assisted procreation for nonheterosexual couples, collectives, and individuals upholds hegemonic methods of reproduction and confirms that France’s Socialist Party supports a policy of state heterosexualism: normative, obligatory heterosexuality would once again be legitimized as a national governmental technique.1 Limiting medically assisted procreation to heterosexual reproducers is the response of the feudal lords of techno-heterosexuality, the answer of the guarantors of the symbolic national masculinist order (who in this case have reached an agreement with the latest defenders of Judeo-Christian-Islamic values) to an unprecedented secular sociopolitical conflict that could threaten their power by giving the bodies of the multitude cooperative control over their own cells, fluids, and reproductive organs. In biological terms, suggesting that you need a “man” and a “woman” to carry out sexual reproduction is as absurd as earlier notions that you could procreate only with a body that shared your religion, your “blood,” your skin color, or your social status. If we are now capable of identifying all of these as political prescriptions that relied on religious, racial, or class ideologies, we ought to also be able to discern the underlying heterosexist ideology and gender-normalization processes in arguments that make the sexual-political union of one man and one woman a condition for reproduction.

中文翻译：

---

政治辅助生育和国家异性恋

象征性的国家男性主义秩序的保证人（在这种情况下，他们与犹太-基督教-伊斯兰价值观的最新捍卫者达成协议）对史无前例的世俗社会政治冲突的回答，这种冲突可能通过放弃大众的身体来威胁他们的权力合作控制自己的细胞、体液和生殖器官。从生物学的角度来看，暗示你需要一个“男人”和一个“女人”来进行有性生殖与早期的观念一样荒谬，即你只能用一个与你的宗教、你的“血统”、你的肤色相同的身体生育，或者你的社会地位。如果我们现在能够将所有这些识别为依赖于宗教、种族或阶级意识形态的政治处方，