:This essay argues that moral accountability depends upon having a shared system of social norms. In particular, it argues that the Strawsonian reactive attitude of resentment is only fitting when people can reasonably expect a mutual recognition of the justified demands to which they are being held. Though such recognition should not typically be expected of moral demands that are thought to be independent of any social practice, social norms can ground such mutual recognition. On this account, a significant part of a society’s social norms are also properly seen as moral norms. The essay defends this overlap of social and moral norms in contrast to views on which moral norms and social norms are sharply distinguished. Lastly, the essay concludes by addressing challenges for accountability in circumstances of norm change.

中文翻译：

---

道德责任和社会规范

：这篇文章认为，道德责任取决于拥有一个共享的社会规范体系。特别是，它认为只有当人们可以合理地期望相互承认他们被持有的正当要求时，斯特劳森的反应式怨恨态度才合适。虽然这种承认通常不应该被认为是独立于任何社会实践的道德要求，但社会规范可以作为这种相互承认的基础。因此，一个社会的社会规范的重要部分也被恰当地视为道德规范。这篇文章捍卫了社会和道德规范的这种重叠，与道德规范和社会规范有明显区别的观点形成鲜明对比。最后，本文最后讨论了规范变化情况下的问责挑战。