当前位置: X-MOL 学术Social Philosophy and Policy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
REDISTRIBUTION AND SELF-OWNERSHIP
Social Philosophy and Policy ( IF 0.264 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-10 , DOI: 10.1017/s026505251900044x
Dan Moller

:Debates about libertarianism and redistribution often revolve around self-ownership. There are two main reasons for this: first, self-ownership is often featured in Lockean accounts of property that endow us with a claim to the resources that are up for redistribution. Second, self-ownership has sometimes been mustered as a way of resisting the additional labor that is said to be required by redistributive schemes. In this essay, I argue that these appeals to self-ownership are misguided. However, unlike most critics of these appeals, I don’t wish to claim that redistribution is therefore vindicated. On the contrary, my main goal is to show that there are alternatives to invoking self-ownership that are more effective and that better capture the core intuition behind libertarian objections to redistribution.

中文翻译:

再分配和自有

: 关于自由主义和再分配的争论经常围绕自我所有权展开。这有两个主要原因:首先,自我所有权经常出现在洛克的财产账户中,它赋予我们对可以重新分配的资源的要求。其次,自有所有权有时被用来抵制所谓的再分配计划所需的额外劳动力。在这篇文章中,我认为这些对自我所有权的诉求是被误导的。然而,与大多数对这些呼吁的批评者不同,我不想声称重新分配因此是正确的。相反,我的主要目标是表明,除了调用自我所有权之外,还有更有效的替代方法,并且更好地捕捉自由主义者反对再分配背后的核心直觉。
更新日期:2020-02-10
down
wechat
bug