当前位置: X-MOL 学术Social Philosophy and Policy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
AUTONOMY AND INDOCTRINATION: WHY WE NEED AN EMOTIONAL CONDITION FOR AUTONOMOUS REASONING AND REFLECTIVE ENDORSEMENT
Social Philosophy and Policy ( IF 0.264 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-03 , DOI: 10.1017/s026505251900027x
Mirja Pérez de Calleja

:I argue that none of the main accounts of autonomy in the literature can explain the fact that people who undergo a certain subtle but powerful kind of indoctrination are not autonomous or self-governing in reflectively acquiring and endorsing the views, values, goals, and practical commitments that they are successfully indoctrinated to adopt. I suggest that, assuming there are historical conditions on autonomous reasoning and reflective endorsement, there is a condition that specifically concerns emotions: the person’s emotional state and dispositions, and her web of emotional dependencies. I explain what we know so far about the kind of indoctrination on which I focus, and I motivate the claim that people who are successfully indoctrinated in this way are not self-governed in reflectively acquiring and endorsing even the first views and values that they adopt as a result of indoctrination. I argue that this heteronomy is not explained by any of the accounts that postulate historical conditions on autonomy: neither by classical accounts such as Rousseau’s and Piaget’s, nor by so-called historical accounts in the contemporary literature, nor by relational accounts. I argue that an accurate account of autonomy must include an emotional condition on autonomous reasoning and reflective endorsement that goes beyond the emotional conditions postulated or implied by historical accounts, and I offer a tentative sketch of this condition.

中文翻译:

自主和灌输:为什么我们需要一个情绪条件来进行自主推理和反思

: 我认为,文献中关于自治的主要叙述都无法解释这样一个事实,即接受某种微妙但强大的灌输的人在反思性地获取和认可观点、价值观、目标和他们被成功灌输接受的实际承诺。我建议,假设在自主推理和反思性支持方面存在历史条件,则存在一个与情绪特别相关的条件:人的情绪状态和性格,以及她的情绪依赖网络。我解释了到目前为止我们所知道的关于我所关注的灌输,我提出这样的观点,即以这种方式成功灌输的人在反思性地获得和认可他们因灌输而采纳的最初观点和价值观方面并没有自治。我认为,这种他律性并不能用任何假设自治的历史条件的叙述来解释:既不是卢梭和皮亚杰等古典叙述,也不是当代文学中所谓的历史叙述,也不是关系叙述。我认为,对自主性的准确描述必须包括一种关于自主推理和反思性认可的情感条件,这超出了历史记录所假设或暗示的情感条件,我提供了这种条件的试探性草图。我认为,这种他律性并不能用任何假设自治的历史条件的叙述来解释:既不是卢梭和皮亚杰等古典叙述,也不是当代文学中所谓的历史叙述,也不是关系叙述。我认为,对自主性的准确描述必须包括一种关于自主推理和反思性认可的情感条件,这超出了历史记录所假设或暗示的情感条件,我提供了这种条件的试探性草图。我认为,这种他律性并不能用任何假设自治的历史条件的叙述来解释:既不是卢梭和皮亚杰等古典叙述,也不是当代文学中所谓的历史叙述,也不是关系叙述。我认为,对自主性的准确描述必须包括一种关于自主推理和反思性认可的情感条件,这超出了历史记录所假设或暗示的情感条件,我提供了这种条件的试探性草图。
更新日期:2019-09-03
down
wechat
bug