ArgumentThis article explores historical sociology as a complementary source of knowledge for scientific research, considering barriers and facilitators to this work through reflections on one project. This project began as a study of the emergence and reception of the infant disorganized attachment classification, introduced in the 1980s by Ainsworth’s student Mary Main, working with Judith Solomon. Elsewhere I have reported on the findings of collaborative work with attachment researchers, without giving full details of how this came about. Here, I will offer personal reflections arising from the process, and my work in what Hasok Chang has called history as “complementary science.”

中文翻译：

---

附件和档案：使用历史社会学作为补充发展科学的障碍和促进因素

论点本文探讨了历史社会学作为科学研究知识的补充来源，通过对一个项目的反思考虑了这项工作的障碍和促进因素。该项目始于对婴儿无组织依恋分类的出现和接受的研究，由 Ainsworth 的学生 Mary Main 在 1980 年代与 Judith Solomon 合作引入。在其他地方，我报告了与依恋研究人员合作的结果，但没有详细说明这是如何发生的。在这里，我将提供过程中产生的个人反思，以及我在张浩硕所谓的“补充科学”中的工作。