What does the New Right want from international relations? In this article, we argue that the philosophy of the New Right is not reducible to a negation of internationalism. The New Right coalesce around a conceptualisation of the international driven by analytics and critiques of specific subjects, norms and practices, that should be treated as a distinct international theoretical offering. We refer to this vision as Reactionary Internationalism. This article examines and locates this vision within the intellectual history of nationalism and internationalism by drawing on poststructuralist approaches to intellectual history and drawing evidence from a discourse analysis of recent Lega, Front National, Brexit, and Trump campaigns. We find that, rather than advocating for the end of internationalism, the New Right seeks to reconstitute its normative architecture on the basis of inequality among identities. This entails dismantling liberal economic and rights-based norms and reframing them around transactionalism and power grounded on identity. Reactionary Internationalism emerges as a distinct philosophy that identifies a hegemonic normative bind and advocates its unravelling so as to liberate subjects understood as defined by their birth-cultural identity.

中文翻译：

---

反动国际主义：新右翼哲学

新右派想从国际关系中得到什么？在本文中，我们认为新右翼哲学不能简化为对国际主义的否定。新右翼围绕着由分析和对特定主题、规范和实践的批评所驱动的国际概念化结合起来，这应该被视为一种独特的国际理论产品。我们将这种愿景称为反动国际主义。本文通过借鉴思想史的后结构主义方法，并从对最近的 Lega、国民阵线、英国退欧和特朗普竞选活动的话语分析中汲取证据，在民族主义和国际主义的思想史中检验和定位这一愿景。我们发现，与其主张终结国际主义，新右翼试图在身份不平等的基础上重建其规范架构。这需要拆除自由经济和基于权利的规范，并围绕交易主义和基于身份的权力重新构建它们。反动国际主义作为一种独特的哲学出现，它确定了霸权规范约束并主张解开它，以解放被理解为由其出生文化身份定义的主体。