当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Scholarly Publishing › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Open Access for Monograph Publishing:Operational Thoughts and Speculations
Journal of Scholarly Publishing ( IF 1.206 ) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 , DOI: 10.3138/jsp.49.2.175
John Wright

Abstract:While open access started as a response to developments in journal publishing, attention is now turning to scholarly monographs. Using the experience of University of Calgary Press, as well as understandings from a neo-institutional framework of analysis, this paper examines how current open access scholarly publishing behaves at the nexus of three intersecting and competing interests: a) an uncoordinated policy environment that applies individual, institutional, and sectorial criteria; b) the exogenous market and technological pressures on contemporary publishing; and c) the embedded, symbiotic role that scholarly publishers play in academe. These factors have combined to create subtle, unintended, and potentially negative outcomes. For any implementation of a large-scale open access funding or mandate to succeed in supporting a sustainable dissemination of diverse, independent, and relevant scholarly publishing, much greater formal policy coordination and a normative and financial commitment to developing new tools for measuring impact, success, and program effectiveness are required.

中文翻译:

专着出版的开放获取:操作思想和推测

摘要:虽然开放获取最初是对期刊出版发展的回应,但现在注意力正在转向学术专着。利用卡尔加里大学出版社的经验以及新制度分析框架的理解,本文研究了当前开放获取学术出版在三个相互交叉和相互竞争的利益关系中的表现:a) 不协调的政策环境,适用于个人、机构和部门标准;b) 当代出版的外生市场和技术压力;c) 学术出版商在学术界扮演的内在的、共生的角色。这些因素结合在一起,产生了微妙的、意想不到的和潜在的负面结果。
更新日期:2018-01-01
down
wechat
bug