During the global commodities boom Indonesia, like many resource-rich countries, introduced an increasing number of nationalist policy interventions. However, the state has intervened assertively in some sectors and only passively in others. In Indonesia's mining sector, interventions that compel foreign divestment received widespread support from politicians and domestic industry; yet similar proposals to limit foreign investment in the strategic agribusiness sector have largely failed. This article brings the literature on resource nationalism into conversation with studies of business–state relations, in order to understand why nationalist mobilization met with more success in Indonesia's mining sector than in agribusiness. It argues that ownership structures constitute the source of this variation. Uniquely integrated patterns of domestic and foreign ownership in the strategic palm oil sub-sector constrained lawmakers’ nationalist agenda. Such constraints were less formidable in Indonesia's mining sector, where foreign capital is more easily differentiated, and concentrated in a sub-sector that contributes less overall to the Indonesian economy.

中文翻译：

---

印度尼西亚的资源民族主义：矿业和棕榈油的所有权结构和部门变化

在全球大宗商品繁荣期间，印度尼西亚与许多资源丰富的国家一样，引入了越来越多的民族主义政策干预措施。然而，国家对某些领域进行了武断的干预，而在其他领域则只是被动地干预。在印度尼西亚的采矿业，迫使外国撤资的干预措施得到了政界人士和国内工业界的广泛支持；然而，限制外国在战略性农业综合企业部门投资的类似提议基本上都失败了。本文将有关资源民族主义的文献与企业与国家关系的研究进行对话，以了解为什么民族主义动员在印度尼西亚的采矿业比在农业综合企业更成功。它认为所有权结构构成了这种变化的根源。战略性棕榈油子行业独特的国内外所有权模式限制了立法者的民族主义议程。这种限制在印度尼西亚的采矿业不那么严重，外国资本更容易区分，并集中在对印度尼西亚经济总体贡献较小的子行业。