当前位置: X-MOL 学术French History › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Patrons Résistants? French industrialists during the Second World War
French History ( IF 0.114 ) Pub Date : 2017-11-06 , DOI: 10.1093/fh/crx067
Luc-André Brunet

Drawing on previously unexploited archival sources from the Comite d’organisation de la siderurgie (CORSID), the article challenges the patron resistant thesis, which has been widely accepted in the literature on Vichy France. It advances several important counter-arguments. It also questions the motives of industrialists who undermined attempts to send French workers to Germany and shows that these actions were initially taken with the tacit support of the Vichy government and were motivated primarily by business interests. Drawing on postwar production figures, this article also challenges the claim that lower output during the war was owing to conscious under-production by industrialists. Finally, it demonstrates that the handful of industrialists who allowed the Resistance to sabotage their factories were not motivated by resistance but were in fact blackmailed into such acts with threats by the Resistance. Based on original research, this article challenges the established view of the patron resistant by arguing that none of these industrialists’ actions should be considered as resistance.

中文翻译:

赞助人抵抗者?第二次世界大战期间的法国工业家

这篇文章借鉴了来自钢铁协会 (CORSID) 的先前未开发的档案资料,挑战了在维希法国的文献中已被广泛接受的赞助人抵制论点。它提出了几个重要的反驳论点。它还质疑破坏将法国工人派往德国的企图的工业家的动机,并表明这些行动最初是在维希政府的默许下采取的,主要是出于商业利益。本文利用战后的生产数据,还挑战了战争期间产量下降是由于工业家有意识地生产不足的说法。最后,它表明,少数允许抵抗运动破坏工厂的实业家并非出于抵抗动机,而是受到抵抗运动的威胁勒索而进行此类行为。基于原创研究,本文通过争辩说这些实业家的任何行为都不应被视为抵抗,从而挑战了赞助人抵抗的既定观点。
更新日期:2017-11-06
down
wechat
bug