Feminist technoscience and feminist phenomenology have seldom been brought into dialogue with each other, despite them sharing concerns with subjectivity and normativity, and despite both of them moving away from sharp subject-object distinctions. This is unfortunate. This article argues that, while differences between these strands need to be acknowledged, such differences should be put to productive use. The article discusses a case of school bullying, and suggests that bringing these analytic perspectives together enables and sharpens examinations of the role of subjectification and subject positions for subjectivity in the phenomenological sense; affectivity within material-discursive entanglements and constellations of humans and things, and as connecting the body, things and the world in specific ways; and normativity as enacted, lived and embedded in perception.

中文翻译：

---

为什么女权主义技术科学和女权主义现象学应该相互接触：关于主体化/主体性

女权主义技术科学和女权主义现象学很少相互对话，尽管它们都关注主体性和规范性，尽管它们都远离了尖锐的主客体区别。这是不幸的。本文认为，虽然需要承认这些链之间的差异，但应将这些差异用于生产性用途。这篇文章讨论了一个校园欺凌的案例，并建议将这些分析观点结合在一起，能够并加强对现象学意义上的主体化作用和主体地位的检验；在人和事物的物质-话语纠缠和星座中的情感，并以特定方式连接身体、事物和世界；和制定的规范性，