当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Journal of Social Theory › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Notes on language games as a source of methods for studying the formal properties of linguistic events1
European Journal of Social Theory ( IF 1.766 ) Pub Date : 2019-02-24 , DOI: 10.1177/1368431018824733
Harold Garfinkel 1
Affiliation  

One of three distinct approaches to his famous ‘Trust’ argument, this paper written by Garfinkel in 1960, and never before published, proposed a rethinking of rules, games and linguistic classifications in interactional terms consistent with Wittgenstein’s language games. Garfinkel had been working in collaboration with Parsons since 1958 to craft an approach to culture that would replace conceptual classification with the constitutive expectancies of interaction and systems of interaction. The argument challenged the work of cultural anthropologists influenced by zoology and biology, who called themselves ‘ethnoscientists’ and studied culture in terms of linguistic classification systems. Garfinkel had proposed an alternative sociological ‘ethnoscience’ of culture and language that would focus on how culture was made, on how linguistic events are achieved, and on the rules of their making. This ‘Language Games’ approach followed Wittgenstein in seeking what Garfinkel called a literal description of cultural/linguistic events: meaning by ‘literal’, a step-by-step account of the constitutive and preferred rules participants use to create a recognizable event-in-a-language. Made famous three years later in version associated with Schutz, Garfinkel’s Trust argument also appears in a 1962 text (Parsons’ Primer, published in 2019) in a version built on Parsons.

中文翻译:

关于语言游戏的注释,这些语言游戏是研究语言事件形式属性的方法的来源1

由Garfinkel于1960年撰写的,从未发表过的论文,是针对他著名的“信任”论证的三种不同方法之一,提出了对规则,游戏和语言分类的重新思考,这些术语与维特根斯坦的语言游戏相一致。自1958年以来,加芬克尔就一直与帕森斯(Parsons)合作,设计一种文化方法,该方法将用相互作用的本构性期望和相互作用系统代替概念分类。该论点挑战了受人类学和生物学影响的文化人类学家的工作,他们称自己为“民族科学家”,并根据语言分类系统研究文化。加芬克尔(Garfinkel)提出了另一种文化和语言的社会学“民族学”,其重点是文化的产生方式,语言事件的实现方式及其制作规则。这种“语言游戏”方法遵循了维特根斯坦的思想,即寻求加芬克尔所谓的文化/语言事件的字面描述:意思是“文字”,逐步说明了参与者用来创建可识别事件的构成规则和偏好规则-一种语言。三年后在与舒茨(Schutz)相关的版本中出名,加芬克尔(Garfinkel)的《信任》论点也出现在1962年的文本(帕森斯的入门读本,于2019年出版)中,以帕森斯为基础。参与者用来创建可识别的语言事件的构成规则和首选规则的分步说明。三年后在与舒茨(Schutz)相关的版本中出名,加芬克尔(Garfinkel)的《信任》论点也出现在1962年的文本(帕森斯的入门读本,于2019年出版)中,以帕森斯为基础。参与者用来创建可识别的语言事件的构成规则和首选规则的分步说明。三年后在与舒茨(Schutz)相关的版本中出名,加芬克尔(Garfinkel)的《信任》论点也出现在1962年的文本(帕森斯的入门读本,于2019年出版)中,以帕森斯为基础。
更新日期:2019-02-24
down
wechat
bug