当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
European Journal of Communication
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Counter-archiving Facebook
European Journal of Communication ( IF 2.463 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-01 , DOI: 10.1177/0267323120922069 Anat Ben-David 1
European Journal of Communication ( IF 2.463 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-01 , DOI: 10.1177/0267323120922069 Anat Ben-David 1
Affiliation
The article proposes archival thinking as an analytical framework for studying Facebook. Following recent debates on data colonialism, it argues that Facebook dialectically assumes a role of a new archon of public records, while being unarchivable by design. It then puts forward counter-archiving – a practice developed to resist the epistemic hegemony of colonial archives – as a method that allows the critical study of the social media platform, after it had shut down researcher’s access to public data through its application programming interface. After defining and justifying counter-archiving as a method for studying datafied platforms, two counter-archives are presented as proof of concept. The article concludes by discussing the shifting boundaries between the archivist, the activist and the scholar, as the imperative of research methods after datafication.
中文翻译:
反归档 Facebook
本文提出档案思维作为研究 Facebook 的分析框架。在最近关于数据殖民主义的辩论之后,它认为 Facebook 辩证地承担了公共记录的新执政官的角色,同时设计上无法存档。然后,它提出了反归档——一种为抵制殖民档案的认知霸权而开发的实践——作为一种允许对社交媒体平台进行批判性研究的方法,因为它关闭了研究人员通过其应用程序编程接口访问公共数据的权限。在定义和证明反存档作为研究数据化平台的方法之后,提出了两个反存档作为概念证明。文章最后讨论了档案保管员、活动家和学者之间不断变化的界限,
更新日期:2020-05-01
中文翻译:
反归档 Facebook
本文提出档案思维作为研究 Facebook 的分析框架。在最近关于数据殖民主义的辩论之后,它认为 Facebook 辩证地承担了公共记录的新执政官的角色,同时设计上无法存档。然后,它提出了反归档——一种为抵制殖民档案的认知霸权而开发的实践——作为一种允许对社交媒体平台进行批判性研究的方法,因为它关闭了研究人员通过其应用程序编程接口访问公共数据的权限。在定义和证明反存档作为研究数据化平台的方法之后,提出了两个反存档作为概念证明。文章最后讨论了档案保管员、活动家和学者之间不断变化的界限,