Admittedly, the book invites some criticism. First, although the three data sets are comparable in terms of word count, the size of each data set is relatively small. As we can see in the analysis in Chapter 4, due to the limited size, the frequencies of several some clusters are zero in one of the data sets, which might render the comparison between the data sets statistically insignificant and have the danger of over-interpretation of the results. Second, the comparison of L1 and L2 speakers in the use of some in this book is largely confined to the distribution of some clusters and some groups. It might be more revealing and insightful if the authors pointed out the differences in the pragmatic functions of some by the three groups of speakers. Despite these minor issues, this book does a great job in providing a thorough analysis of the elasticity nature of some used by L1 and L2 speakers in educational settings, and it is also a useful reference book for students and researchers of discourse studies, particularly for those who take a pragmatic perspective.

中文翻译：

---

书评：Frans H van Eemeren 和 Bart Garssen（编辑），从论证方案到野外论证关系：对论证理论的各种贡献

诚然，这本书引起了一些批评。首先，虽然三个数据集在字数上具有可比性，但每个数据集的规模都比较小。正如我们在第 4 章的分析中看到的那样，由于规模有限，在一个数据集中，一些集群的频率为零，这可能会使数据集之间的比较在统计上不显着，并存在过度计算的危险。结果的解释。其次，本书中对L1和L2说话者在一些使用上的比较，很大程度上仅限于一些集群和一些群体的分布。如果作者指出三组说话者在语用功能上的差异，可能会更具有启发性和洞察力。尽管有这些小问题，