While the book is commendable in many ways, further improvements are possible. First, its innovative applications of Multidimensional Analysis and Topic Modelling are open to refinement, as acknowledged by the authors themselves. Second, the interplay between the mono-/inter-disciplinary parameter and two other parameters discussed briefly in the book, the natural/social science parameter and the proximal/distal disciplines parameter, deserve more elaboration. One of the major findings of the book, the heterogeneity of interdisciplinary journals, has been shown to be at least partly attributable to the natural science–social science divide and the proximal–distal divide in several studies reported in the book. A generalized interpretation of this interplay in the concluding chapter would have provided the readers with a greater insight into the heterogeneous nature of interdisciplinary research discourse and a better knowledge about how to address the intended readership specifically.

中文翻译：

---

书评：Cornelia Ilie 和 Neal R. Norrick（编辑），语用学及其接口

虽然这本书在很多方面都值得称赞，但仍有可能进一步改进。首先，正如作者本人所承认的那样，它对多维分析和主题建模的创新应用是开放的。其次，单学科/跨学科参数与书中简要讨论的其他两个参数（自然科学/社会科学参数和近端/远端学科参数）之间的相互作用值得更多阐述。该书的主要发现之一，即跨学科期刊的异质性，已被证明至少部分归因于该书中报道的几项研究中的自然科学-社会科学鸿沟和近端-远端鸿沟。